Re: New York Times DSLR article

[Paul Stenquist]

Apple's success is due more to good product, good PR and word-of-mouth 
cult status than advertising. The ads play a role, but other factors 
are much more important. And that's from an ad guy.
On Apr 23, 2005, at 10:58 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

The only reason Apple currently exists is their advertising campaigns,
Pentax exists in spite of theirs...
DagT wrote:
På 23. apr. 2005 kl. 09.52 skrev Cotty:
On 22/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great letter, Jon!
"Pentax is the 'Apple' of the camera industry."  I love it!  <g>

I tend to think of Pentax as the 'Pentax' of the camera industry.....

Sure, but they do have a lot in common.  The users have chosen not to 
follow the masses and advertising campaigns .  They represent the 
independent users who like to make their own decisions (and mistakes) 
.-)

DagT