Knarf, my only point was that photos are taken by people. What make of equipment used is irrelevant if the operator doesn't have a clue to the technical & aesthetic aspects.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:28 PM Subject: Re: Digital profligacy > I said: "which camera has a higher ratio of interesting photos to duds?" > > To which Ken Waller responded: > > Gee, and I thought it was the photographer that took the image not the camera. > > > > Kenneth Waller > > You don't think that some photographers shoot more digitally because > they can without paying a premium? > > Judging by the number here who proudly trumpeted (within a couple of > months of buying their *istD), "My shot count is such-and-such!", I'd > say that most shoot much more when film price isn't a factor. > > So yes, I did mean "which camera" and not "which photographer". > > cheers, > frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >
