a digital camera is better than both. i have used my P&S digital camera for a light meter on occasion when i shot a particularly tricky lighting situation using slide film. take the picture and look at the histogram and the preview image to see where the shadows and highlights end up. since both had about the same dynamic range, it worked.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Understanding exposure? Recommendations?



For folks who do not do their own processing a spot meter is overkill. All you can do in that case is move your exposure up and down the scale to select for shadow or highlight detail. In which case an incident meter and a little intelligence works much better than a spotmeter. A little more experience and you can use a incident meter almost as well as a spot meter for zone system work. For actually controlling lighting (as in a studio) an incident meter is hands down better. However I will admit that a spotmeter is far more gadgety and that seems to be what 90% of todays photographers want.




Reply via email to