On 6/13/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In Oz you'd also have liability and indemnity in the back of your mind as the > equipment lender. <snip>
How so? You mean if something went awry, and tweeb's equipment fried Bill's? Or if Bill tripped over her equipment or perhaps knocked it over onto himself or others? I don't understand. If the issue is Bill's equipment, I'd think that he's implicitly waiving any claims against her by asking if he can plug in. One or two polite questions from tweeb would satisfy her that Bill knew what he was doing, and waived any claims against her. IMHO, anyway... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
