On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, David Nelson wrote:
I just reckon that an f/4 version would be hard to market as being better than the DA unless it was well touted as being super sharp wide open (hard to imagine). I suppose there's always the FF thing.
Exactly, and the constant aperture. One is clearly consumer, the other would be prosumer. Like the 16-45 and the 18-55 (if you disregard the fact that the 16-45 is not FF).
Kostas
