Hello William
So, you ran similar tests :-)
I got mine from Berlin in August 2004.
So, it might be a late model.
I like it very much, but judging from the red light at the back, it takes
appr. half a minute to write a 5-shot-burst of RAW-files on to a Ultra II
card. It will take the camera 10 sec's to write just one RAW-shot!
This seemed too long to me - thus the test. I was actually surprised when I
found out, that the camera could shoot more frames after just 9-10 seconds.
In fact its only 6 seconds after finishing the first five. That all i must
wait - 6 seconds.
When shooting sports, people etc. 6 seconds seem like an eternity!

Regards
Jens


Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. juni 2005 16:52
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Fps and buffer test - Pentax *ist D



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: Fps and buffer test - Pentax *ist D


> It's often said that the *ist D is kinda slow and has a too small buffer.
> So, I ran a little test:
>
> I took 6 shots of my kitchen clock.
> I held the shutter down and took 5 RAW file shots in a row. I kept
> pressing
> the shutter - after the 5 frame burst - to see how long it would take the
> camera to get ready for frame number six.
> Here are the reslults:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/469145/
>
> Comments are of course welcome!

Your camera seems faster than my camera by about 4 seconds.
I wonder if they didn't make an undocumented improvement to the camera. Mine
is pretty early in the model run, I understand yours is a little later.

William Robb



Reply via email to