Here's another crop:
www.dariobonazza.com/provv/latitude2.jpg
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Why an istDs?
It is not. The apparent blur is the result of low sharpness setting. I
prefer adding a proper unsharp mask during post-production, according to
the print size. On the contrary, the Ds was set as default, hence heavy
USM and "bright" color setting. BTW, the true colors of the scene were
somewhere in betweeen the two pictures, probably closer to the D picture.
However, this is not the the comparison I wanted to do. I just wanted to
show that the DS is capable to better open the shadows (highlights being
comparable).
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Why an istDs?
The *ist-D sample looks to be out of focus as well.
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Looks like more than exposure latitude going on there.
Kenneth Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why an istDs?
To get an idea abot exposure latitude difference between the D and the
DS:
www.dariobonazza.com/provv/latitude.jpg
Dario
________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com
--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).
