I have a ZX-M. I believe the complaints center around the size of image.
It is a relatively small view through the finder. I don't think it is much
different than most of the ZX line however. Most people end up going for
the ZX-5n because of multiple focus modes and AF if you desire it. It can
be turned on or off with a switch.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Advice about MZ-M
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Conrad Samuels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: June 23, 2001 12:10 AM
> Subject: Advice about MZ-M
>
>
> <snipped>
> But what is the actual problem with the MZ-M
> > viewfinder?
>
> From what I understand, it is a mirror system rather than an
> actual pentaprism. Whether this makes a visible difference or
> not I do not know. I have never compared.
> William Robb
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
