Cool..  thanks!

Mike


>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: MX Question.  (Was Re: Black MX Body Ex+)
>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:37:11 -0400
>
>Externally, from a user-interface perspective, the MX is *much* smaller
>than the K1000 and has a self-timer and depth-of-field preview (push the
>self-timer lever in towards the lens mount).
>
>Through the viewfinder, the MX displays the selected shutter speed and 
>aperture
>and has a series of 5 LEDs instead of a needle to show over/under exposure.
>
>Functionally, the MX has user-interchangable focusing screens, a much more
>sensitive and linear Gallium-Arsenide Photodiode light meter and accepts
>either a 2 fps auto-winder or 5 fps motor drive.
>
>
> >New to the pentax world so forgive me if this is an obvious answer but
>What
> >are the main differences between the MX and my K-1000.  From  a
> >user-interface perspective, they look almost identical -except for what
>I
> >assume to be a self timer on the front...
>
>
>
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to