Hi Frank,
There's something to be said for the new version. I like the sharpneing, and I like the reduced highlights. I would choose it over the original. But I think you can do better. In the new version, you've lost all the shadow detail in the leaper's face. I'd go back to the original and use Shadows/Highlights rather than levels, and just bring down the highlights. If you don't have Shadows/Highlights, go to curves and pull down the far end of the RGB curve to kill some of the highlights.
Paul
On Aug 14, 2005, at 5:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:

As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:

First, on the original, I sharpened only the jumper, and not the
background, with the result that the background is more OOF-looking
than on the print.  On Version 1.1 I've sharpened the whole frame.

Second, I fiddled with levels a bit to darken it.  I now think that
the original looks over-bright and over-exposed.

Let me know if you have a preference.  I certainly prefer the
"improved" version:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3634511&size=lg

For reference, here's the original:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907&size=lg

Thanks in advance.

cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson


Reply via email to