Quoting Gautam Sarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You can't legally publish the photographs in a way that would be offensive > > to the persons shown in the picture, even though the pictures are legally > > aquired. > > The problem I have is what defining what constitutes "offensive to the > persons shown in the picture." No law, IMO, should be so unobjective > that it leaves the definition of crime to unspecified "persons." > >
It doesn't matter if the picture is offensive to anyone, as long as it portrays the truth, and has not been aquired illegally. Nothing can stop a person from suing you, but the truth will stop the lawsuit dead in it's tracks. William Robb
