Me think, cheap Canon lenses are really _cheap_ Tamrons! But who am I to say? I'm using a Tamron 28-75/2,8 and _want_ to believe its a proper lens.
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26. august 2005 14:21 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Why full frame? > > Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I concur on the 820 - I threw one in the trash too! My HP 7960 is > >so much better. My experience with Epson printers is that the > >expensive ones are great and the cheap ones are crap. Kind of sounds > >like Canon lenses <grin>. > > Ah, but keep in mind that cheap Canon lenses are really Tamrons! > > -- > Mark Roberts > Photography and writing > www.robertstech.com >