In a message dated 8/26/2005 8:33:19 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The local CVS carries "single use" digital cameras, horrible low resolution things, at about twice the price of a single use film camera without review, and twice that for a model that allows review of the last shot taken. Both allow you to delete images but without review how would you know that you wanted to...
I've thought about buying one to try to crack the interface. ============= So, right now, maybe disposable digitals won't replace disposable film cameras? I was just thinking that disposable film cameras were a big part of Kodak's profits at one time. Not sure, it just seemed that way. Family gathering, get a disposable film camera. Trip, get a disposable camera. I mean, I thought lots and lots of people did that. Non-photographer types, ergo, disposable digital could be the same and Kodak could retain profits in that area. But not unless the pictures are semi-worth it. Or maybe disposable film cameras will be a market that will continue for sometime. If they are cheaper, etc. I think I have only really seen disposable Kodak and Fuji cameras. They seem to have cornered that market. Marnie
