Forgot to say: The starting point is online at the same link http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=191903 The slightly modified colour file is thumbed under the picture. Clicking the thumb loads this instead of the B&W.
Something else I'm missing now? Please let me know if so. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30. august 2005 15:02 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: WOW(Was:First attemt on B&W conversion) > > A very good idea Don. Sounds like great fun, and a great way to learn. > Hereby this picture is a WOW (I like the acronym, hope it makes it a "wow" > picture) > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=191903 > > You are probably right Don, this one is a hard nut to crack. The > similarities in the tones in the statue and the man is what I like with > the > picture. That, and the similarities in the body language. He is a part of > the statue, without really being it. > > A comment on my first attempt: To me, the sky is the main problem, its > simply boring. > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 30. august 2005 14:38 > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > Subject: RE: First attemt on B&W conversion > > > > Tim, > > We used to have (Still do?) a thing called "WOW" here. > > It stood for "Work Over Week" where someone would post a link > > to their _original image_ and other members would "Work it Over" > > and then post their results. > > It was a great learning experience as some of the results > > were wonderful, and others not so good. > > Why not give it a try so some of the more experienced > > members can have a shot at it? > > To me this looks like a very difficult shot to convert as many > > of the tones in the statue and in the man are so close together. > > > > I have used the tools Mark suggested, most often "BWorks": > > http://www.mediachance.com/digicam/bworks.htm > > It's rather "Idiot Proof", which is what I need. ;-) > > > > Don > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 7:15 AM > > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > > Subject: First attemt on B&W conversion > > > > > > > > > This is my first attempt on doing a B&W conversion. No it isn't. I > have > > > tried before, with a crappy technique from a computer geek book > > > about using > > > PSE3. > > > > > > You have seen the picture before. > > > This time I've tried a simple Channel Mix. > > > 20 red, 70% green and 10% blue. The values Shel suggested as a > starting > > > point. I fiddled a bit back and forth, but ended up with this. It came > > out > > > Ok-, but nothing more. > > > > > > Anybody got better ideas? A better mix, another solution? Not too > fancy > > > please, I'm a total newbie at this. > > > > > > After submitting the picture I noticed some specs in the sky, have no > > idea > > > where they came from. Don't believe it is dust on sensor. Never > > > mind, thats > > > a minor issue now. > > > > > > Oh, nearly forgot ;-) > > > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=191903 > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > > > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > > > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
