Frankly, this demonstrates a distinct lack of understanding of how programming software goes. The only difference which results in the different compiled binaries is the selection of a single option at compile time.

Frankly, I've programmed at various levels (Including on a 4-bit system I built out of discrete logic by shuffling wires and with hand-assembled hex machine code on a Z80 system).

It appears that you are now grasping at possible explanations. Especially since this post directly contradicts everything else you've said on the issue (For most of this thread we've been talking at the code level, which is where you compare these differences).

Godfrey's an expert on this, I'm certainly a journeyman myself, with a better technical understanding than practical ability (I need to know how this works for my work, but I don't need more than a basic ability to actually code).

-Adam

Graywolf wrote:

I do know that neither system understands a word of that source code you are talking about. We tend to abstract ourselfselves from the hardware to the point we do not understand how it works at all. I was going to say it only understands binary code, but that is also an abstract to make it easier for us (humans) to understand. The computers only understand a string of high and low electrical states. The PC's in intel code, and the Mac in Power PC code. If you load either with the others code, most likely you will get nothing, if you are lucky, or smoke, if you are not.

In the days when you entered that string of electrical states into a row of switches on the front panel it was hard to miss that. In this drag and drop programing era it is easy to miss.

As I said what runs on the two computers are entirely different programs.

I would also like to point out that it is not I who starts contradicting you with my ignorance, but the other way around, and it happens over and over and over. It would be polite to find out if maybe you are misunderstanding someone before you call them a stupid fool.

Strangely enough I do not doubt your experience or knowledge. I do find I doubt your understanding of what you know. When talking to the machines you have to have all your ones and zeros in a row in the proper order. Most humands do not need you to do that for them to get the gist of things. I usually think I am talking to humands when I write something here on the list. Maybe I am in err?


graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


Reply via email to