Hello John, In the reply to Shel, I posted a link to the beginning of that series. There are some tighter shots that perhaps you might like more. Here is the link again: http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Bullock/bullock_0106.htm
Thanks for your comments. -- Best regards, Bruce Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 4:16:08 PM, you wrote: JF> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:51:34PM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> I flew out to Baltimore several weeks ago to do the photography for my >> niece's wedding. This is one of the shots from an outdoor bridal >> portrait session. >> >> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld >> ISO 200, 1/180 sec @ f/5.6 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bullock_0109.htm >> >> Comments welcome JF> I've gone back to this several times. I think there's just too JF> much of the space given up to the bridge and to the lower skirt JF> portion of the gown, neither of which have much interesting detail. JF> I love the angle of the head, the detail on the bodice, the flower JF> (and, in particular, just how well the lighting shows these off). JF> I think a much tighter crop would produce a stronger image.
