Both are pretty good. For me it's not a tough choice, not at all. Num two is better composed, but the infants hand makes it in num one. They seem to be better "connected" in that one. Num two is more correct, but lacks the little extra "touch".
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11. september 2005 20:29 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: PAW: G and A > > > Never posted a PAW before. This is actually two, but very similar > pictures. I would normally dislike the first one, as I have chopped > the son's head on the left: > > http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/%7ekavousan/GandA.jpg (<100KB) > > However this one I like less, but do you agree/understand why? > > http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/%7ekavousan/GandA2.jpg (<100KB) > > Both are with the MZ-50, one of my 50s, Tri-X [EMAIL PROTECTED], scanned from > (traditional machine process, not digital scan, and B&W paper) print > using a bottom-line Canon scanner. > > Thanks in advance for any comments. > > Kostas >
