Well, the truth may be what you behold, but it ain't necessarily what we
behold. the fatc remains you've yet to post a single solid reason beyond
the wishes of a few users as to why Pentax should spend engineering
dollars to include a feature desired by a fraction of their potential
market, especially when they already offer more in this regards than
their competition.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
For your information it was the spotmatic list
and the moderator admitted that he really had
no reason to kick me whatsoever, its just
that due to the incredible amount of blatantly wrong
posts and misconceptions by the posters there who
didn't like being told the truth constantly
by me and they felt I was a problem for them, I guess
I was because they must have been quite embarassed
by some of the things they found out were all wrong,
but I had to comment because some things were
actual purchase recommendations - VERY BAD WRONG
recommendations that needed to be set straight....
I suggest you contact the moderater and question
HIS actions , not mine because the moderator
was also involved in the wrong end of some of
the discussions. Now do you get it?
JCO
-----Original Message-----
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:40 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Rename request
he dropped out of the Nak Talk mailing list too, whether willingly or not,
because of the same things.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Rename request
Brian,
JCO was on the Yahoo Pentax Screwmount Lens list until last week. It's
a moderated list and the moderator threw him off for repeating similar
behavior to what he exhibits here. Obviously, he needed a place to
go, so we got him. Perhaps if we all wrote to the other list
moderator, they would take him back?
