Stop the personal attacks or leave. everytime you get mad for me pointing out your obviously flawed posts and postions you lose it and start back into the pointless attacks control yourself please. its unbecoming... jco
-----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:34 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > You openly admit that it was a biased guy > who works for pentax that told there > wasn't sufficient market feature to benefit > ratio? Yup, a biased guy who knows his marketplace. A biased guy who works in the industry, not some pompous freak who takes boring pictures of swimming pools for fun. > > If you read or remembered the thread I already > explained to you the "official" company > reason given for questionable decisions > is NOT the real reason. You cant > give that persons explanation too > much creedance. Whats he going to say > if it wasn't true, the real truth? I can't give any credence to a bombastic cretin who doesn't work within the industry at all. William Robb
