Stop the personal attacks on me now! If you cant argue my posts in specific manner you have NO RIGHT to be calling me foolish. It only makes you look beyond foolish to do so. ( Or should I say cowardly? Because to call my posts foolish without actually arguing against specific points you arent risking the fact that YOU may be wrong. ) It plain stereotypical intellectual bigotry if you label as foolish without any reasons stated or comments quoted of mine.
Get it? jco -----Original Message----- From: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:07 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Rename request Yes, this isn't the first time he's made a complete fool of himself on this list. John On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:10:43 +0100, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JCO is one of the old timers here. Bob Sullivan wrote: > >> Brian, >> >> JCO was on the Yahoo Pentax Screwmount Lens list until last week. >> It's a moderated list and the moderator threw him off for repeating >> similar behavior to what he exhibits here. Obviously, he needed a >> place to go, so we got him. Perhaps if we all wrote to the other list >> moderator, >> they would take him back? >> >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On 9/19/05, Brian Dipert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Dear list manager, >>> Please consider renaming this list to the jc_and_pj-discuss list. >>> Because, >>> clearly, these two individuals feel they're entitled to dominate it >>> with >>> their long-repeated, long-winded, business-naive and tiresome >>> opinions. You >>> might have a mass unsubscribe exodus if you do, but perhaps you're >>> already >>> experiencing this, and anyway the new name would more accurately >>> reflect >>> what this list has unfortunately become in recent days. >>> >>> Exhibit A: >>> "I am not going to move on until the posts >>> which incorrectly explain why this was done >>> cease. I am not bringing it up over and over >>> again, I am just explaining why these wrong >>> "reasons" used in some arguments by those >>> who don't "agree" are wrong. If you don't agree >>> fine, I can accept that but if your argument >>> explaining why you don't agree is flawed >>> or false I am going to rebut it. That's all.... >>> why do we have to forcefully move on? Threads die all by >>> themselves...." >>> >>> ============================== >>> Brian Dipert >>> Senior Technical Editor: Mass Storage, Multimedia (audio, displays, >>> 2-D and >>> 3-D graphics, and still and video imaging), PC Core Logic and >>> Peripherals >>> EDN Magazine: http://www.edn.com >>> My blog: http://www.edn.com/blog/400000040.html >>> 5000 V Street >>> Sacramento, CA 95817 >>> (916) 760-0159, fax (781) 734-8038 >>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Visit me at http://www.bdipert.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date: 19/09/2005
