Rob Studdert wrote: > > On 4 Oct 2005 at 20:04, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > IF I had done the eye dropper thing though, would > > I still be able to claim at photo.net that > > the image was unmanipulated? > > Yes. > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/manipulation.html > > >From "What is an unmanipulated image?" > > "Contrast adjustments and color balance adjustments may be made in enlargement > and printing, scanning software, image editing software, etc, as may selective > darkening or lightening of areas of the photograph (dodging and burning). But > these should not be so extreme as to render the image an inaccurate or > unrealistic representation of what the photographer saw" > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Thanks, luv :) ann
