On 10/7/05, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahhh.... But you guys don't understand. Frank will not be able to
> collect anything because he was operating his vechicle in an illegal
> manner; that is without a bell, nor a rear brake.

wrong!  at most, if they were contributing factors to the accident,
they would amount to contributory negligence on my part, and limit the
percenyage i can collect.  but they are no bar from claiming or
collecting.
>
> I know how this works because decades ago I was in a fender bender. The
> cop kept asking the other guy if he was hurt. After about 12 times the
> guy said, rathere sarcastically, apparently to get the cop to shut up,
> "Well, I scratched my little finger". As a result of my having been in
> an accident "with injuries" my auto insurance went up to $1000/month.
> Needless to say I drove for the next 3 years without insurance.
>
> Let me guess, Frank, the woman was pretty? The cop was trying to cut her
> a break at your expense?

no, she was around 75 and quite distraught

-frank


--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to