I think it's too much. You can usually find the M 50/4 macro for less than a hundred dollars. To my mind, a wide aperture is not necessary on a macro. It makes focusing a bit easier, but with the limited DOF you get when shooting macro, wide open is rarely an option. Paul
> 300 US$ is a bit too much for this lens, isn't it? > Anybody got any comments on this lens? > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > >
