On 25 Oct 2005 at 17:17, William Robb wrote: > It's nice how some things never change. > Five years ago we were bitching that Pentax didn't have a film camera to > compete with the best that Nikon or Canon were putting on the market. > At least we are consistent.
Well some of us may have been but you can check trough the archives, it sure as hell wasn't me. The LX system did everything I needed and for when it didn't I had an MZ-S and I was quite looking forward to pairing the MZ-S with an MZ-D. > Anyone that thinks that Pentax, on it's own, can come close to competing > with either Nikon or Canon on specifications has rocks for brains. They are dragging their ass along the ground at the moment, they are a far cry from even keeping up with the bottom end from other manufacturers. > They have been out of the running specification wise for about 35 years now, > except for a few glorious years when the LX was actually a pretty good camera > by > comparison. Why does anyone think that's going to change? They have to change or bail. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
