Actually, a correction and apology: It's not Adventure 3, it's
Expedition-3 (the one I have) and here is its picture:
http://www.tamrac.com/5273_lrg.htm
Sorry for the confusion. Yes, it does look that the Expetion 4 is a
couple inches wider. Given that the Expedition-3 holds snugly exactly
what I need it to hold, the -4 would just be extra bulk that I don't need.
Don Sanderson wrote:
David, can you show us a pic of the bag?
All I see are the Adventure 2, 8, 74 and 75.
Which is it most like?
Thanks
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: David Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 5:46 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Bag enablement
On a recent trip, one of my Tamrac bags gave out. I have several, but
this one was the only one that could be carried comfortably, yet with
enough room for body, four lenses (included mounted lens), flash,
batteries, etc. But unlike most Tamrac bags, this one was a cheapie and
I've been waiting for a good reason to upgrade. With a split out seam,
broken buckle, and broken zipper pull all within a few days of each
other, it's time.
I replaced it with a Tamrac Adventure 3 photo-pack. I just wanted to
offer my assessment.
It snugly accommodates (almost exactly) the following gear:
Inside:
*ist-DS body
AF-330FTZ flash
SMCP-DA 16-45 f/4 ED AL
SMCP-FA 50mm f/1.4
SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 IF AL
SMCP-FA 135mm f/2.8 IF
Spare batteries
Spare SD media
Cell phone
Other assorted small things like lens cloth, pen, etc.
Three hard hoods (nested) and a flash diffuser.
Strapped to back:
Ten inch (when extended) tripod
Strapped to sides via Tamrac's Modular system:
Pouch with SMCP-FA 80-320mm f/4.5-5.6
Pouch with water bottle
