I bet it's the lab's work that's saving his ass. Does he process the film? Does he make the prints? It doesn't matter, really. If he, and others, want to skirt by and rely on the labs and computers to get good prints, that's their business. That's the new way to do things. I'm just an old fart who believes that getting it right in the camera means better results over all.
I don't know what PP of A is, and that he sometimes wins awards is irrelevant. The national Cheese Council once gave an award to Velveeta. Velveeta is a "good enough" cheese <LOL> Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > His work is so good it's stunning. He frequently wins PP of A competitions. > > > > What a depressing attitude. "Good enough most of the time" seems to be the > > prevailing attitude these past few years. Would you buy a product that was > > advertised as "Good enough most of the time?" <LOL> I just had this > > thought about birth control devices that were good enough most of the time. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I have a friend who's been making his living as a wedding and portrait > > photographer for the last 20 years and did it part time for the previous > > 20. He never takes an exposure reading. I know there's a lot of skill > > involved but the film latitude still saves his butt on occasion. > > > > > > The old bright sun, cloudy bright, heavy overcast settings are good > > enough for color negative film most of the time. > > > > > > Tom Reese > > > > > > > > > >
