Just trying to be realistic...
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:29:00 -0400
And then Tom, with no digital camera, will scream, ""The sky is falling,
the sky is falling."
On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Tom C wrote:
Which would be par for the course... followed by a competitor's press
release that their bottom of the line offering has the same 10MP and their
top models kick the you know what out...
Tom C.
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:59:39 -0400
the Samsung/Pentax press releases say that next fall, we will have an
announcement of a roughly $2K body. if the Nikon D200 comes in at about
$2K instead of $2.5K, its capabilities are going to be the benchmark of
comparison. i figure that Pentax can match the 10 megapixels because
Samsung has no real choice if it wants to provide competitive sensors,
but i'm not so sure of frame rate and AF performance. if the D200 comes
in at around $2.5K, then Pentax doesn't have to be as high spec.
Herb...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
But some do, and for those people it would be nice to have the choice.
Anyhow
it will be mildly entertaining to see who here actually embraces an
updated
DSLR assuming that actually Pentax manages to deliver one inside the
next
decade, thank dog for archives.
