You know what? I was impressed as hell with the performance to price ratio
of that lens. A zoom of that range for CDN$500 or so that gave quite usable
results, especially up to the 200 - 250mm point. No, it's not a top
performer, and yes, it had faults, but the bang for the buck certainly was
there. Sometimes I wish I had kept mine.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: K85/1.8 results
> I would hope that most primes and higher-end zooms ARE sharper than the
> 80-320, since that lens is intended to be a consumer zoom. I know it gets
> made fun of a lot, but I have one and use it all the time.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
