I like to travel very lightweight, and from my current equipment list I
would choose the following:
MX
SMC-M 35/2.8 (or FA 35/2 AL)
SMC-M 135/3.5
A better complement to the 35 mm would be something like 85/1.8. I have a
Tamron AF SP 90/2.8, which is very good but somewhat big. I am thinking of
investing in a 77/1.8, in that case the MX together with a 43/1.9 and 77/1.8
could be it. Maybe the MZ-3 instead of the MX also...
To sum it up: One body, one wide-normal lens and one small tele.
/Erik
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 19 juli 2001 04:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit
Okay, I've got a question to pose to everybody/anybody, just for fun:
If you could but together a basic but complete Pentax outfit--everything you
need but no fat, no extraneous items included--what would it be for you?
I think mine would be:
LX with FA-2 finder and Grip B
28/3.5-M
35/2-M
50/1.4-M
85/2-M
100/4-M Macro
135/3.5-M
or else:
Spotmatic SP
50/1.4 S.-M.-C. Takumar
85/1.8 S.-M.-C. Takumar
24/3.5 S.-M.-C. Takumar
Anybody else want to play?
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
