Well, as Rob pointed out, it's alwasy best to avoid the parallax problem in the forst place. Especially if you want to use photgraphs with a foreground. Jacks's library pano couldn't have been done without nodal point adjustment - there's simply to much depth in that scenery. Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 12. november 2005 03:06 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: PESO Library Pano On 11 Nov 2005 at 19:50, Herb Chong wrote: > as others have pointed out, it's parallax error that is causing the problem. > some stitching programs are more sensitive to it than others. PhotoVista ignores > it fairly well in the way it blends. i basically never compensate for it. other > people using other tools sometimes have to be fanatical about it, getting to > within 1 or 2mm of the nodal point or else see strange artifacts. that's one > reason i never use the Panorama Tools-derived products. all of the ones i have > tried are extremely sensitive because they don't have good blending algorithms. You can always utilize a blending plug-in such as enblend, it is a very impressive tool and will transparently mask fairly gross parallax errors though it always works best with image sets free of parallax errors. http://enblend.sourceforge.net/ Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
