> LOL ... On the basis of that rationale, why did you buy a Pentax? ;-) Never bought a Pentax. I have been lying to hang around here among the cool people here ;-)
That was pretty obvious a lye. I think you are playing dirty here. The result is the same from a Pentax as from a Canon, after conversion. A HTML file designed for IE is not the same as a file designed for other browsers. Different browsers interprets the HTML in different ways. Ah. What a ****. Why am I bothering to reply on this? Ok. I'm not always a logical man. Happy now? ;-) Go on whip somebody else. Whip Frank, he is the official guy to whip. BTW. Why haven't Graywolf said anything on that in the PDML FAQ? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16. november 2005 16:58 > To: PDML > Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24 > > LOL ... On the basis of that rationale, why did you buy a Pentax? ;-) > > Yes, IE is here. So is doggie poo. Doesn't mean I want either of them > in front of me on my desk. Both stink. > > Godfrey > > On Nov 16, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > > > Rant warning: > > IE may be junk, but it is what most people use. > > ... > > What am I saying? IE is here, for good or for bad. > >
