Ralf, First, to answer your question: http://www.photolightimages.com
Thanks for relating your experience. Pixel size and depth, file size generated, lens, focus, camera rest, etc, can make the difference. Jack --- "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I realize no one can decide for me, but would appreciate your take. > > It might help to know what your main subjects are. I've just spent my > first weekend with my new *istDS. I'm impressed but certainly not > over > the moon. Yes, the smooth sky is nice but that's not everything. > While > sharpness and detail are OK in some shots and not in others, my main > problem is with out-of-focus areas which look mostly awful. > > Two things are sure: My LX and the Minolta 5400 give me way more > detail > and resolution and digital those nightshots of my industrlal sites > will > have to wait for another digital camera generation or two. > > I will be shooting less film - if only for convenience or rather > lazyness - but I certainly won't be able to abandon it. > > YMMV > > Ralf > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany > private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de > manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005 > Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
