Yep! As long as you realize that the choice is vague (anti-nitpicker
statement).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Jack Davis wrote:
Got it..the smaller the sensor the greater the density the smaller the
pixel the noisier the image.
The crossing point is that place where you make a noise/image choice.
Jack
--- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, the smaller the pixel the more noise.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Jack Davis wrote:
Maybe it's a question of a pixel density/noise crossing point?
The more pixels the more noise?
Jack?
--- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you asking at what point the signal-to-noise ratio becomes more
importatant than pixel count?
Sounds like a pretty simple question, but it is not. A small sensor
2mp
camera is adequate for web use. An astronomer wants a camera that
is
not
going to generate a noise pixel when the point sources he is
photographing may only be one pixel wide (I believe they work
around
that by comparing multiple images taken a few minutes apart. The
stars
seem to move the noise usually doesn't). I think that right now in
consumer grade sensors a 6mp APS size sensor is about optimum which
may
explain why the makers don't seem to be in any great hurry to
increase
megapixel counts on the semipro cameras.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Bill Owens wrote:
Where is the crossover point where sensor size overtakes the
number
of
megapixels in regards to final print quality.
Bill
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
