>This reflects the US view on what is important news. I think, more correctly, this reflects A US view on what is important news.
Time doesn't speak for the US anymore than the BBC speaks for England. Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dec 13, 2005 9:12 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: Time Magazines Best Photos of the Year 2005 It's a US magazine, more than half the pictures are about news where US citicans are involved. This reflects the US view on what is important news. That is only natural, although a little sad. I have seen lots of better pictures from other stories. DagT > fra: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dato: 2005/12/13 ti AM 08:45:53 CET > til: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > emne: RE: Time Magazines Best Photos of the Year 2005 > > It's not their job to publish inspirational and joyful photos. The world is > awash with that type of photo. What it's short of is good hard news > photography. > > The big news stories of the year have been the tsunami, hurricanes and so > on, so that's what you'd expect to feature. What would people have said > about balance if at the end of 2001 there had been nothing about the WTC > attacks? > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12 December 2005 17:15 > > To: pentax list > > Subject: Re: Time Magazines Best Photos of the Year 2005 > > > > On 12/12/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > >Depressing bunch of photos. I mean I know it's PJ stuff, but surely > > >they could have found some inspirational and joyful photos > > to publish. > > > > I agree entirely. I good set of pics is all about balance. No > > balance here. There are some outstanding individual examples, > > but as a set, they do not live up to the title they bare given Time. > > > > Let's see Nat. Geo's set! > > ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
