Not at all. No problem! Thanks,
Jack --- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is an example of people rushing wrongly to judgement. A local > council removed children from their families because some idiot > believed > rumours about satanism. The consequences were devastating. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4602268.stm > > There are always far too many people ready to believe the worst, > however > nonsensical. > > John > > PS: Jack - I thought you were being serious. Apologies. Moral: > don't > forget the smiley. Not all list members were lucky enough to attend > a US > High School. :-) > > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:13:38 -0000, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Okay, chase is over. > > > > Jack > > > > --- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Jack Davis wrote: > >> > >> > You're right, it was Kostas who used the "personal tone". My > >> apologies, > >> > Rob. > >> > Kostas? > >> > >> No, no personal tone in the "gut feeling" statement, went for a > joke > >> that did not quite work. The "metrics" part you have answered. The > >> "humorist" comment is John's. > >> > >> Kostas > >> > >> > Jack > >> > > >> > --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Ahh... Rob didn't say that. He said: > >> >> > >> >> "Yeah, Judge Judy airs here too" > >> >> > >> >> This is the problem with chopping emails up, people get miss > >> quoted. > >> >> > >> >> Dave > >> >> > >> >> On 1/11/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> As you say, you're missing some posts. > >> >>> The statement is a parroting of a formula comment picked up > >> >> (professed) > >> >>> in high school. It was offered with a curiosity about the > >> reaction. > >> >>> Rob, why the personal tone? > >> >>> > >> >>> Jack > >> >>> > >> >>> --- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, John Forbes wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:23:03 -0000, Rob Studdert > >> >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> On 10 Jan 2006 at 16:32, Jack Davis wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> US justice system is far from perfect, it's only the best > one > >> >> in > >> >>>> the > >> >>>>>>> world. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Yeah, Judge Judy airs here too. ;-) > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Rob Studdert > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> He's quite the humourist, this Jack Davis. But he has a > short, > >> >> and > >> >>>> rather > >> >>>>> selective, memory. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I missed the original post. Jack, I am wondering about the > >> >> metrics > >> >>>> you > >> >>>> are using to deduce that it's the best in the world. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> If you tell me "gut feeling", I should remind you what it's > full > >> >> of. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Kostas > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> __________________________________________________ > >> >>> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around > >> >>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > __________________________________________________ > >> > Do You Yahoo!? > >> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> > http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
