Logic is fading and dream time fast approaches.
Otis Wright
Pål Jensen wrote:
> John wrote:
>
> > In that case, why on earth are you spending so much time arguing
> > that *your* definition of "professional" is the only one that makes
> > any sense?
>
> I'm ceratinly not blowing my horn about whats a professional camera or not. I'm
>replying to a post that do blow the horn and fuel a myth. I'm also strongly objecting
>to statements that Pentax don't offer pro service. The do where I live and in Japan.
>Don't know about north america. The definition of professional cameras is industry
>wide about durability and shutter cycles is often used as benchmark - usually over
>100 000 cycles for 35mm slr's. Its not my idea. Whether or not the MZ-S is a pro
>camera or not depend on whether or not Pentax says so. If the do say so it is. If
>they don't it aint. The same apply for Canon. It has nothing to do with the
>infrastructure around it.
> The criterias flying around excludes all pro medium format system because they don't
>offer support at the Olympics, no extensive lense line and probably not rental
>service in every dirty hole. And medium and large format pros must be second class
>professionals cause the never experience the same support as Canon and Nikon shooters.
>
> Pål
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
