Yessir!
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Optio WPi
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/01/20 Fri AM 09:42:56 GMT
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: Optio WPi
And the WP has a very good lens too! Comparing it to Optio S6, Optio SV,
and
Optio 60 (same pictures in same situation), those taken with the WP were
the
best of the bunch.
Dario
Thanks. Is the only difference between the WP and the WPI the number of
pixels?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Optio WPi
> mike wilson wrote on 20.01.06 9:10:
>
>> Anyone got any experience with the above, or the WP?
> Not exactly with WP, but with older 33WR. A LOT OF FUN!!! We took many
> photos underwater in Red Sea with my friend - no problems at all, I
> used
> it
> many times at pools - preformed very good, attracting people's
> attention
> ;-)
> And I think good digicam should be like that - you don't have to worry
> even
> in dust/dirt/water. What's the fun with digicam if you have to worry
> about
> it all the time? ;-) WPi has higher JIS class, meaning that it is even
> more
> water resistant than 33WR, so you can't go wrong with it!
>
> --
> Balance is the ultimate good...
>
> Best Regards
> Sylwek
>
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
