Sounds like 'It's so good I want a mint copy'.

-Adam


cbwaters wrote:

"It's so good I'm getting rid of it"

interesting.

Cory

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: FS: Pentax M 4/75-150mm (Was: Enablement: M 4/75-150mm)


Please look at this small gallery, made with this lens.
Quite frankly, I'm impressed. As sharp as a prime, I believe.

I like it so much I'm already looking for one more, in like new condition. My current one has a dent in the lens hood, and one VERY smal dent in the
barrel.
It's for sale actually. (I hope my next one is as good as this one -
optically :-).
The last picture in the gallery was made with my (very sharp) K 2.5/135mm @
F. 4.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72057594051619927/

If anyone wants it, please mail me an offer.
mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards
Jens


Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 20. januar 2006 00:10
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Enablement: M 4/75-150mm


Thanks, Don. I think I do :-)
Regards

Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. januar 2006 22:40
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Enablement: M 4/75-150mm


Looks good Jens, I thought you'd like that lens.

Don
BTW: That's an accordian, not a harmonica. ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:20 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Enablement: M 4/75-150mm


Today I got my "new" toy - a Pentax-M 4/75-150mm off ebay UK.
This is not a real test - but it still shows that this is not a
bad lens at
all:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/88681507/

Regards
Jens

Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk









--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/2006



Reply via email to