What I meant to say about Namo Web Editor, was: it's not too difficult it's award winning (rated higher than FP by users/reviews) has quite good administration tools responsive support allows html editing as well as "wysiwyg" editing, including immediate preview widely used not too expensive
But as I said, see if your webhost offers free easy to use software for web editing... Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 29. januar 2006 06:26 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Web Page That's not saying much. Unless you want to guarantee your site is down. FP is the bane of webhosting companies everywhere. -Adam P. J. Alling wrote: > My opinion of front page was that it worked better as web site manager. > > Charles Robinson wrote: > >> On Jan 28, 2006, at 1:52, Jens Bladt wrote: >> >>> A good web creator is crucial, but a little expensive. >>> >>> I bought an older version of Namo Web Creator. An awarded application. >>> Allegedly better than Microsoft Frontpage. >>> >> >> ..well, what isn't? >> >> (or were you kidding....) >> >> -Charles >> >> -- >> Charles Robinson >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Minneapolis, MN >> http://charles.robinsontwins.org >> >> > >
