I think so, but first of all I read what you wrote. "Involved" can mean
a lot of things to a lot of people in surprisingly different ways.
Keep the rules simple, and weird thinking (as I tried to show) can't happen.
That's what I meant, I hope you know (now).
Cheers,
Pancho
Dario Bonazza schrieb:
You know what I meant.
Dario
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pancho Hasselbach"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
Well,
but up to which limit?
Mmmmhhh, what if I attach my Zenitar lens to my Ricoh body, even if
they are connected by a K mount?
Or:
"Taken with a Canikolta, with a Pentax Filter attached"?
"Lighting measured with Pentax digital spot meter, picture taken with
an Olyflex"?
"Lens cover detached for taking picture is branded Pentax"???
I see some wisdom in the rule that at least a Pentax camera or lens
must be used, period.
And yes, I do take pictures with my Minolta Autocord, Olympus C-5050,
or whatever comes to hand or seems right at the moment, but I don't
feel a need to contribute these pictures to PUG.
And I do agree on what Bob Sullivan said about commitment created by
restrictions. I'm not yet at the level that I go and take pictures
related to the monthly theme, but this is something I want to get
close to, because it is part of a collective effort.
Pancho
Dario Bonazza schrieb:
I keep suggesting the most obvious rule:
"There must be some Pentax equipment involved"
(IMO, even disguised, if well known it is Pentax like in case of
Samsung clones)
Dario
