"Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not >> photography is "art". Far as I'm concerned it is and that's >> "settled law". Helmut's "answer" is a bit oblique for me and >> since you don't disagree, care to comment further? Thanks! > >Define "art"
You can't. That's *why* it shouldn't be used! ;-) BTW: The local supermarket now has a device with which they can take your digital image file and "print" it on a cake in colored icing. So "good taste" *can* be discussed with regards to photography. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
