Yes, the walls and the "in wall" details can, and does stand as photographic subjects. Generally I do like them. This said, I miss details. I assume they work a lot better printed out bigger and in better quality than a monitor allows.
The compositions are pleasing to the eye. But I believe I would have preferred a little less door and stair. They tend to dominate the frame a bit too much IMO. That may be the reason I prefer the last one. The digital lith technique looks interesting. It would have been interesting to see them as they came out of the camera to compare. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 5. mars 2006 22:05 > To: 'pentax-discuss' > Subject: GESO--brickwork > > All, > > The brick wall is classic fodder for lens test pictures. Can it stand as > a > photographic subject on its own? > > http://www.westerickson.net/brickwork/ > > --Mark > > These are my first real 31Ltd images. All were taken handheld with a > *ist-Ds and postprocessed using a "digital lith" workflow. Comments and > suggestions welcome as always. >
