On 3/14/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Smart ass ex lawyer ;-)

I've never made any claims to any intelligence levels.  I can
certainly be an ass, though. <g>

> Ok, you'll have it your way.

I rarely do.  This will be a treat!

>
> First argument: Did I claim n'existe pais? No, I said I _barely_ exist, at
> morning.

I understand that.  My point wasn't that you didn't exist, simply that
existence is an "on-off" type of thing.  Either you do or you don't. 
You can't "barely" exist.  Even subatomic particles such as muons
whose independent existence is measured in millionths of a second, do
indeed fully exist for those brief periods of time.  So even if you
feel sub-human before your first cup of coffee in the morning, it
can't be said that you are ever anything other than a fully existing
being.

> Second argument: Admitting to exist, does that make me feel? Your argument
> is similar to the logic of a character by the famous Danish writer Ludvik
> Holberg. He proved that a person was a stone by saying: Can a stone fly? No.
> Can you fly? No. Thereby are you a stone.

That, of course is just silly.  Amusing, but silly.  I won't grace it
with a rebuttal...

>
> Third argument: It is proven beyond reasonable doubt that you Frank are not
> a living person, but a computer generated shit chat'er. Thereby are you not
> entitled to make a valid argument.

The validity of any argument has nothing to do with the nature of the
person or thing that generated the argument.  A statement is right or
wrong in and of itself, and its correctness is quite independent of
it's author.

However, I can't blame anyone for playing the odds and considering the
source as part of their decision-making process in deciding whether a
statement is right or wrong.  You played the odds, but you lost. 
<vbg>

>
> Got you, and it felt gooood.

You didn't actually get me, but if it made you feel goooooood, then
I'm happy, too.  <g>
>
> BTW. Your post amused me.

Then I consider my post a success.

cheers,
frank


--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to