I agree with Frank. A few previous posts referenced "trite
technique". I think that can freeze us (group pressure being
applied) from experimenting further.
For example, I used to think that pictures taken deliberately
"unsquare" (ie camera tilted noticably off plumb square) were
trite. I still think most are. But I've seen people use the
technique effectively, even though the hit rate might go down.
If you like the effect, Boris, keep experimenting. Once in a while
you'll snag a really nifty one. Please yourself. I've tried this
kind of photo before and I think this beats anything I've done...
but then I ain't no danged good.
-Lo
frank theriault wrote:
On 3/15/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and appreciated.
I like it. I must say, I usually exect "smooth" lines from these
sorts of time exposures. At first the "jiggly" lines were a bit
off-putting, but the more I look the more I like.
Cool shot!!
cheers,
frank
