On Mar 24, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have no need for this lens to cover 24x36mm.
A 20mm lens for that format does the job I want to do just fine.
Why should I pay the difference in price for something I don't need or
want?
It's just something to carp about. Really, how many people who
complain about its coverage would buy it for their 35mm film cameras if
it covered full frame and cost nearer to the Nikons and Canons?
How many people complaining about the potential non-compatibility of
the new high end lenses with old gear are buying new high end lenses
for their old gear?
How many people complaining that the FA* lenses are hard to get
actually want to buy one?
-Aaron
