Does it not seem curious that the article doesn't mention what damage Kodak is allegedly doing to their customer's files? I read the article twice and found nothing but generalities and a degree of vagueness unusual even for the web.
Shel > From: "John Francis" > Subject: Kodak accused of harming digital photo quality > I'd have thought this article (linked off the page below) was a lot more > relevant to us photographers (or is that image capture technicians? :-) > http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=184401030
