Note to myself: Speaking of anals, I must let my blunder go ;-)
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 4. april 2006 14:08 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: > Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > Not change # in headline. > > This is as ugly, ass can be. > This list _is_ the dark side ;-) > > Seriously. Isn't it "real English" to use anals as short for analects? > My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: > > Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > > > I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. > > > > And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, > > but > > it sure is very muddy looking. > > Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left > > office > > by accident. > > > > When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed > > by > > getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general > > "picture". > > > > Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply > > forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not > > proud > > of that either. > > > > The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and > > photoshopping. > > > > Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have > to > > give me a warm "we all do mistakes" hug. > > (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and > > will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) > > > > When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the > > right moment, trying to get it right "in camera" (if the bird is still > > there). > > > > > > Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 > > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > > Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red > > > > > > I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. > > > http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 > > > This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same > > > standpoint, and from the same "session". > > > > > > The result is a "new" head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. > > > This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. > > > So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. > > > > > > Whatdoyuahthink? > > > What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or > > > different? > > > Does it look "real"? > > > And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? > > > (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) > > > > > > A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > > > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > > > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
