I don't have any noticeable hot or dead pixels on either of my D
bodies. I think I ran some tests on the first one a couple of years ago
and saw nothing. I would discourage anyone from trying to swap sensors.
Not a home repair job.
Paul
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed AM 01:55:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
It's okay, Lon, my own camera doesn't display this problem.
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
I meant how do you cure the camera, not how to get rid of them in
post -- I'm doing stuff where speed of turnaround requires very
little or no post work.
-Aaron
There's no cure for it, except in postprocessing. Although, if you
really have a "clean" sensor, you could swap that between bodies.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
Date: Tue Apr 4, 2006 6:06 pm
Size: 491 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
The bad pixels are "built in" to your sensor, and everyone has them
in a
different location. It's not hard to make a photoshop action that
will
minimize them at a certain capture size. Email me for details.
-Lon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Dave, that's from your D. The spots I'm asking about are on the
player's chin, on the jersey logo and on the Nikon sign. So they're
not dust -- how does one get these bad pixels in the first place,
and how does one get rid of them?
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
