The square version is an improvement over the original.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: This beach is not big enough for both of us
Based on your and Jack's input I did another crop. I played safe and used
the rules of third. If you are interested, it is at a thumb below the
picture. The remaining problem is that the second bird doesn't stand out
of
the ground. Not much to do about that I guess.
BTW. My trigger finger is ok. Today I'll give it some real exercise and
bring along my image tank ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10. april 2006 16:41
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: This beach is not big enough for both of us
Tim, it doesn't look over sharpened to me.
Compositionally, the location of the lower bird causes the bird to get
lost
in the ground clutter.
The upper bird is a good capture especially back lit as it is. But I'd
loose
some of the background water above the bird.
The cocked shore line is a minor distraction to me.
2GB huh, you must have a tired finger!
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: This beach is not big enough for both of us
> Now, I've made the gapahuk (the camouflage). Spent two hours there
> yesterday. Great fun. Filled two 1Gb cards.
>
> Here is one of the things I experienced
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=229864
>
> This is over sharpened IMO. It needs some more tweaking I think it is a
> keeper. Post processing was hard, contrasty. It was hard to get the
> details
> out of the shadows. This is the best I can do for now. I still got a
> lot
> to
> learn. But now I find raw processing fun. I believe that's a good sign
;-)
>
> What I like about this picture is the sun shining through the feathers,
> and
> off course, the action.
>
>
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>
> Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
> (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
>
>
