On Apr 21, 2006, at 9:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a screen capture of your page with Safari, however. It's
rendered in sRGB:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/rs-test-image-icc.jpg
Both the two profiled images are darn close, the unprofiled sRGB
deviates just a little from a "correct" rendering.
Yes, the tomato at the bottom right isn't quite as saturated.
Screen dump of IE render under W2k 4/2005:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/ICC_Test_dump.jpg
Screen dump of Firefox render under W2k today:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/ICC-test-screen-dump.jpg
And a screen dump of the page as viewed in Firefox with the two
sRGB samples as
viewed in a colour managed application below:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/colourspaces.jpg
My screen cal is close enough to sRGB standard that I still get
away with a
decent rendering of web images rendered with sRGB intent in either
browser.
Thanks for the additional samples. It is always interesting to me to
see how the various browsers render our work. I updated my JPEG to
include current FireFox on Mac OS X rendering too ... FireFox does
not honor profiles, they use their own rendering library rather than
the Mac OS X system libraries.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/rs-test-image-icc.jpg
It's all in the details ...
Godfrey
